Architects vs. Building Designers: Which Offers the Best Value for Your Money?

Architects vs. Building Designers: Which Offers the Best Value for Your Money?


  • This blog explores the important decisions homeowners face when choosing between an interior design architect and a design-build firm for their residential construction projects
  • It highlights the importance of having an understanding and appreciation for both professions
  • Design-build firms offer a streamlined process but may lack accountability and personalization on projects
  • Architecture design firms maintain a clear separation between design and construction, highlighting transparency and accountability while creating bespoke designs
  • It highlights the importance of considering personal values and reflecting on what clients want to get out of their investment
  • The decision between design-build firms and architecture design firms ultimately depends on factors such as project needs, client values, risk perception and financial consideration
Interior designer and construction team working on a residential interior design project.

Deciding to embark on the journey of creating your dream home is an exciting yet complex process. Among some of the many decisions homeowners will encounter, one major decision that can greatly impact the outcome of the project is whether to hire an architect or a design-build firm. Navigating this decision requires an in-depth understanding of the distinct differences between architects and building designers, as well as having an appreciation for the unique value each professional brings to the table. Within this blog, you will gain the insights necessary to make an informed decision that aligns with both your vision and budget, ensuring that your investment transforms your space into the perfect home of your dreams. Continue reading to learn more.

Architecture Firms vs. Design Build Firms

When it comes to home design projects, the debate between design-build firms and architecture design firms sparks a major discussion about streamlined efficiency versus accountability. Common questions include: Do you value accountability during the design process? Are you concerned only about a house being built, and moving in as soon as possible? This answer will vary from person to person, depending on their values, needs and wants and will shape the decisions that they make.

Design-Build Firms

To start, design-build firms present a streamlined process by eliminating the traditional separation of design and construction services for their projects, as they repeatedly build and offer the same services and design time and time again. This style of construction is loved by many homeowners as it aims to seamlessly blend the expertise of interior designers, interior architects, and residential architects, limiting the amount of back-and-forth communication between all parties working on the project. However, this design model can be a double-edged sword.

One concern with this type of design model lies in the potential for the firms to cover up their mistakes rather than addressing them transparently. For example, in the event of a mistake, the lack of a clear distinction between the interior designer, architect, and contractor can hamper the identification and resolution of issues. With this design model, clients may find it challenging to hold specific parties accountable, as the lines between design and construction responsibilities blur. Choosing to go down this design route requires clients to place their full trust in the firm, without the reassurance of checks and balances.

Architecture Design Firms

On the other hand, architecture design firms have a different approach to projects, maintaining a clear separation between design and construction services. Skilled architects ensure that the right team is built around the needs and desired outcomes of the project, which gives clients an advantage in terms of accountability.

Within the interior architecture design firm model, if a mistake occurs, the accountability process is more transparent. The separation between the client, architect and contractor allows for a clearer identification of responsibilities, making it easier to pinpoint and address issues or concerns. This is a huge advantage to clients, as they can confidently navigate the design process with peace of mind.

Which One is Right For You?

The choice between design-build firms and architecture design firms hinges on the needs and expectations of the project and the values you carry with you. Where design-build firms offer a seamless, integrated process that may save time, there may be challenges in terms of accountability throughout the process. On the other hand, architecture design firms provide a more personalized and accountable structure and service, creating a home that is bespoke to the customer. Beyond these points, it is important to remember, and take into account, the idea of perceived risk when choosing which route to go with for your project; while design builds may be overall generally perceived as low risk, this is not always the case. It is also imperative to gather as much information as possible while in the beginning stages of your project so that you can make the best-informed decision that is right for you. This is why it is important to reach out to an architect in addition to a design-build firm, as many experienced architects have vendors and/or contractors they work closely with and who are well-versed in managing and eliminating risk.

The creative design lead looking at the camera in a yellow hard hat standing in the middle of a building renovation project.

Navigating Finances: Comparing Design-Build Firms and Architecture Design Firms

In the world of home design, financial considerations heavily influence the outcome of residential projects, prompting a closer look at both the design-build firms and architecture design firms.

Design Build Firms: A Streamlined Process for a Generic Home

Design-build firms boast streamlined efficiency, minimizing on-site time and creating a profitable model, as their primary reason to exist is to maximize margins, not to create bespoke or creative homes. They are able to do this by streamlining the design-build process, therefore replicating the design construction details for every home that is produced. As these cookie-cutter homes are perceived to be lower-risk, many people are drawn to this type of model as it provides them with a sense of security in knowing what exactly their money will be invested in.

However, it is important to note that the standardized nature of this design does not necessarily equate to significant cost savings. More often than not, these types of homes cost the same (or in some cases, more) as it would to hire a residential architect to create a bespoke home. The standardized nature of design-build firms highlights an important question: is investing in a generic home worth sacrificing a tailor-made space, if the cost of both may be nearly the same? Ultimately, this answer will be unique to each individual and the values that they hold.

Architecture Design Firms: Unique Project Outcomes Tailored to You

Architects on the other hand, approach projects with an emphasis on unique, inspired designs, adding a layer of creative depth to their projects. Not focused on maximizing margins or creating a profitable model, the primary focus of architects is the client, design process and execution; the total opposite of the design-build business model. No two projects will ever look the same, as the client's lifestyle and personality play a pivotal role in creating a bespoke home. To some, this bespoke style provides more value for their money compared to design-build firms.

Therefore, when it comes to the best value for money, clients must consider the perceived efficiency of design-build firms alongside the artistic creativity offered by architecture design firms and align it with their values. While design-build firms are perceived as a lower-risk option, clients need to decide if sacrificing design customization translates into the best value for their money, while architecture design firms, with a more personalized approach, bring to the table unparalleled creativity and a strong team dedicated to the project, which for some, may be a better option.

Overall, whether you value the low-risk open of a proven concept or the originality and innovation of unique interior spaces, weighing the benefits of an interior architect vs. a design-build firm against your own criteria is key when choosing what will be the best value for your money. Your choice will ultimately reflect on what you find most essential: if interior design, personalization and uniqueness are important, an architect may be your best bet. If a tested formula and generic home fit your needs, a design-build could offer a swift, reliable and potentially low-risk option. Regardless of your decision, it is important to choose professionals who understand and resonate with your vision and can bring that vision into reality with integrity. If you are ready to elevate your project with a personalized, artistic touch, contact us today to get started.

Jenna Bond

Jenna Bond is a seasoned writer and a passionate advocate for interior and architectural design. With a keen eye for detail and a deep appreciation for the art of creating beautiful spaces, Jenna has established herself as a leading authority in the field.

As a dedicated writer for Stewart-Schäfer, Jenna has crafted a wealth of informative and inspiring content that caters to the needs and interests of design enthusiasts and professionals alike. Her articles, filled with expert insights and creative ideas, have become essential reading for those seeking to elevate their understanding of interior and architectural design.

More articles

03 . 10 . 23

Budget-Friendly Adjustments for Your Kitchen Remodel

Floor plan for Interior design project by Stewart Schafer
03 . 10 . 23

Budget-Friendly Adjustments for Your Kitchen Remodel